Purchase Price Adjustment
What is the Purchase Price Adjustment? Businesses do not shut down operations during the transaction, so there is often a need to adjust the payments after the Closing to reflect the actual state of the Business on the Closing Date. This provision provides a way to make the necessary adjustments.
The Middle Ground: If the parties agree to adjust the Purchase Price based on one or more particular business metrics, the Purchase Price Adjustment section outlines the specifics on how that criteria will be used to adjust the price, and a time period for when the calculations must be made (typically by the Buyer). This section also details how long the Seller has to object to the calculations and, if an objection is made, the procedure for settling the dispute. For example, a popular basis for adjusting the Purchase Price is to calculate the final Working Capital figure (specified Current Assets less specified Current Liabilities), and a popular dispute resolution procedure is to first rely on good faith negotiation and, should that fail, to select a third-party accountant to resolve the discrepancy between the parties. To limit the disputes under this section and encourage resolution through negotiation, the Agreement may allocate payment responsibilities for the accountant’s fee to the party whose Working Capital figure is furthest from the accountant’s final determination. Another good way to avoid post-Closing Purchase Price Adjustment disputes is to clearly define how Accounts Receivable will be counted when calculating Working Capital at Closing. If money is billed before Closing but received after, whose money is it? What is the Buyer’s obligation to pursue the collection of funds that will ultimately flow to the Seller? Such terms are highly fact-specific, meaning there’s no clear middle ground, but it’s important to take those considerations into account in order to maximize the chance of avoiding post-Closing disputes.
Purpose: A Purchase Price Adjustment provision functions to ensure that value paid for the Business matches its current value. The magnitude of this provision’s impact depends on the specifics negotiated by the parties, such as which measurement is used to determine the adjustment. Unless there is a massive change in the value of the metric being used to determine the adjustment between the signing and Closing dates, the shift in Purchase Price will not be significant compared to the overall value being transferred. Despite the relative size, Purchase Price adjustments are often heavily negotiated because neither side wants to end up with less value than they give away.
Buyer Preference: The Buyer wants to be the party preparing the evaluation of the metric(s) in question. If the Buyer prepares the evaluation, it will support a scheme whereby the accountant’s fee is paid proportionally based on how close each side is to the accountant’s final determination. That scheme reduces the likelihood for disputes because taking an unreasonable position may lead to higher costs for the party taking that position, and since the Buyer is preparing the evaluation (in its ideal scenario), the Seller is more likely to accept it unless they are firmly convinced that their valuation will be closer to the accountant’s final determination. The Buyer will typically hold a portion of the Purchase Price in an escrow account until the adjustment is made; it will usually want that account to be separate from an escrow account used for potential indemnification claims to make sure that indemnification payments will be made if a claim arises. As for treatment of Accounts Receivable, the Buyer will likely want to assume those accounts to maintain the Business’s normal cash flow cycle, but in doing so it may request a representation from the Seller about the creditworthiness of the customers or even a guarantee requiring the Seller to pay for any Accounts Receivable that ultimately isn’t paid.
Seller Preference: The Seller wants to prepare the evaluation on which the Purchase Price adjustment is based. When the Seller is in control it will favor a fee arrangement that discourages the Buyer from challenging its conclusion. Timing of the evaluation may also be an important consideration because the Seller will want the adjustment to be based on the company’s performance while still under its control. The Seller is typically against both an escrow arrangement and applying interest to the adjustment. That is because the Seller generally wants to be paid the entire Purchase Price as soon as possible (i.e. no escrow) and adjustments typically favor the Buyer (i.e. no interest), perhaps because the Seller is more likely to be overconfident about the Business’s future performance. The Seller wants to be compensated for the full value of Accounts Receivable that are transferred to the Buyer rather than retaining the risk of nonpayment and relying on the Buyer to collect on the accounts. In other words, the Seller wants to treat these accounts just like any other current asset being factored into Working Capital.
Differences in a Stock Sale Transaction Structure: None.
